Economic Development
                                      
                                    SB 356 – Keep Our  Graduates Working Act
                                                                        On  Wednesday, January 15, SB 356 by Senator Travis Hutson (R-Palm Coast) was heard  in the Senate Rules Committee and was reported favorably with 16 yeas and 0  nays. AIF  stood in support of this legislation. 
                                    The bill  removes the state authority to take disciplinary action against a healthcare  practitioner who defaults on a student loan or who fails to comply with the  terms of a service scholarship. Under the bill, a healthcare practitioner may  not have his or her license suspended or revoked by the Department of Health  (DOH) solely because of a loan default or failure to complete service  scholarship obligations. 
                                     Additionally,  the bill specifies that a state authority may not suspend or revoke a license  that it has issued to a person who is in default on or delinquent in the  payment of his or her student loans solely on the basis of such default or  delinquency. The bill defines the term “state authority” to mean any  department, board, or agency with the authority to grant a license to any  person in this state.
                                     SB  356 will now move to the Senate floor.
AIF supports efforts to protect Florida’s workforce from  professional license revocation exclusively due to loan default.
                                   
                                    Legal & Judicial
                                      
                                    HB 7 – Relating  to Legal Notices
                                                                        On  Wednesday, January 15, HB 7 by Representative Randy Fine (R-Palm Bay) was heard  in the House Local, Federal and Veterans Affairs Subcommittee and was reported  favorable with 7 yeas and 5 nays. AIF’s Senior Vice President of  State and Federal Affairs, Brewster Bevis, stood in opposition to this  legislation. 
                                    All meetings of a county, municipality, school board, or  special district at which official acts are to be taken or at which public  business is to be discussed or transacted must be open to the public and notice  must be given. All legal notices and publications must be made in a newspaper  that meets the following qualifications: 
                                    
                                      - Published at least once a week; 
 
                                      - At least 25 percent of its words are in English; 
 
                                      - Considered a periodical by the post office; 
 
                                      - For sale to the general public; and 
 
                                      - Contains information of interest or value to the  general public in the affected area.
                                        
                                       
                                    
                                    The bill would allow a governmental agency the option to  deviate from print and publish legally required advertisements and notices on a  publicly accessible website.
                                     HB 7 will  now move to the House Judiciary Committee.
                                    AIF opposes internet-only public notice, as it  eliminates the wide net created by print media and the internet combined.  Web pages are present one day and gone the next; the internet is an inherently  unreliable platform for critical information.
                                    HB 305 –  Relating to Preemption of Conditions of Employment
                                                                        On  Wednesday, January 15, HB 305 by Representative Bob Rommel (R-Naples) was heard  in the House Workforce Development & Tourism Committee and was reported  favorable with 9 yeas and 5 nays. AIF stood in support of this legislation.
                                                                        Local governments have broad authority to legislate on any  matter that is not inconsistent with federal or state law. A local government  enactment may be inconsistent with state law if (1) the Legislature "has  preempted a particular subject area" or (2) the local enactment conflicts  with a state statute. Where state preemption applies it precludes a local  government from exercising authority in that area.
                                     The bill:
                                    
                                      - Expressly prohibits a county,  city, district, or other public body created by state law from requiring an  employer from paying a minimum wage other than the state or federal minimum  wage or to offer other conditions of employment; 
 
                                      - Expressly preempts to the  state the right to regulate any requirements imposed upon employers relating to  a minimum wage and conditions of employment; 
 
                                      - Defines “conditions of  employment” to include preemployment screening, job classification, job  responsibilities; hours of work; scheduling and schedule changes, wages,  payment of wages, leave, paid or unpaid days off for holidays, illness,  vacations, and personal necessity, and employee benefits; 
 
                                      - Voids any ordinance,  regulation, or policy currently in existence which is now preempted.
 
                                    
                                     
                                    HB 305 will now move to the House  Local, Federal and Veterans Affairs Subcommittee.
                                    AIF supports  legislation that allows Florida businesses to adhere to state or federal wage  requirements, thus eliminating onerous regulations set by municipalities
                                   
                               Insurance
                                      
                                    HB 359 –  Relating to Insurance
                                                                        On Wednesday, January 15, HB 359 by Representative David Santiago  (R-Deltona) was heard in the House Insurance & Banking Subcommittee and was  reported favorable with 15 yeas and 0 nays. AIF’s  Senior Vice President of State and Federal Affairs, Brewster Bevis, stood in support  of this legislation. 
                                    The bill provides needed reforms to  the insurance industry by:
                                    
                                      - Requiring the Legislature to  appropriate money from the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund to the Office of  Insurance Regulation (OIR); 
 
                                      - Providing revised requirements for  certain audits; 
 
                                      - Revising timeframe during which  statute of limitations for certain civil remedy actions; 
 
                                      - Authorizing releases of trade secret  information obtained by the Department of Financial Services & OIR; 
 
                                      - Prohibiting OIR from disapproving  rates for homeowner's insurance under certain circumstances; 
 
                                      - Providing claims under  property insurance policy, rather than claims for specified loss or damage, are  barred unless notice is given to insurer within specified timeframe.
                                        
                                       
                                    
                                    HB 359 will now move to the House Government  Operations & Technology Appropriations Subcommittee.
AIF supports smart,  targeted reforms that help keep the insurance markets up to date while  protecting Florida policyholders.