Energy
                                      
                                    HB  797 – Relating to Public Utility Storm Protection Plans
                                    On Monday, April 1, HB  797 by Representative Randy Fine (R-Palm Bay) was heard in the House  Government Operations and Technology Appropriations Subcommittee and was reported favorably with 11  yeas and 0 nays. AIF stood in support of this legislation.
                                                                        This bill aims to harden Florida’s utilities grid  against tropical storm and hurricane damage with proposed under-grounding of  electric infrastructure. The bill would require public utility companies  (Florida Power and Light, Duke Energy Florida, Gulf Power Company, Tampa  Electric Company, and the Florida Public Utilities Corporation) to submit a transmission  and distribution storm protection plan to the Public Services Commission, with  updates required at least every three years. Data collected after Hurricane  Irma showed that underground lines suffered minimal outages during storms. 
                                     HB 797 will now move to the House Commerce Committee.
AIF supports actively seeking ways to harden our state's infrastructure and more effectively prepare for hurricanes and tropical storms to ensure that power is quickly restored.  
                                   
                                    Legal & Judicial
                                      
                                    HB 1161 – Relating to Malt Beverages
                                                                        On Monday, April 1,  HB 1161 by Representative Spencer Roach (R-North Fort Myers) was heard before  the House Government Operations and Technology  Appropriations Subcommittee and was reported favorably with 12 yeas and 0 nays. AIF stood in support of this legislation.
                                                                        This bill creates a process for returns of malt  beverages by a vendor to a distributor for an exchange of product, a refund, or  a credit. A vendor may return malt beverages to a distributor if the malt  beverages are a “damaged product,” an “out-of-code” product,” or an “undamaged  product.” An “out-of-code product” is a malt beverage that has exceeded the  manufacturer’s code date indicating the product’s freshness and availability  for purchase at retail. A distributor is not required to accept a return  request. A product may not be returned because it is overstocked or slow-moving  or because there is only limited or seasonal demand for the product. Under the  bill, a vendor may request return of undamaged product to a distributor only  for exchange of product or for credit and an out-of-code product may be  returned to a distributor only for an exchange of product.
                                     HB 1161 will now move to the House Commerce Committee.
                                     AIF supports legislative efforts to revise outdated laws that impose burdens and restrictions on any sector of the business community, including vendors and distributors of malt beverages.  
                                    SB 7096 – Relating to Constitutional Amendments 
                                                                        On Monday, April 1, SB 7096, sponsored and heard by  the Senate Judiciary Committee, was reported favorably with 4 yeas and 2 nays. AIF’s Senior  Vice President of State and Federal Affairs, Brewster Bevis, stood in support  of this legislation.
                                                                        This bill changes the process for amending  the constitution by citizen initiative by: 
                                    
                                      - Requiring  petition gatherers to be Florida residents and registered with the Secretary of  State;
 
                                      - Disqualifying  petitions collected by unregistered petition gatherers from counting toward the  number of petitions required for an initiative amendment to appear on the  ballot; 
 
                                      - Prohibiting  compensation to petition-gatherers on a per-signature basis; and 
 
                                      - Requiring  the ballot for an initiative amendment include: 
 
                                      
                                        - A bold-font, capitalized statement  regarding the financial impact to the state if the Financial Impact Estimating  Conference determines that the measure will increase costs, decrease revenue,  or have an indeterminate fiscal impact; 
 
                                        - A “yes” or “no” determination by the  Florida Supreme Court as to whether the policy in the amendment could instead  be accomplished by the Legislature instead of through the initiative amendment;  and 
 
                                        - The  name of the amendment’s sponsor and the percentage of contributions received by  the sponsor from in-state contributors. 
 
                                      
                                    
AIF supports legislation that adds transparency and  accountability to amending the Florida constitution by citizen initiative.