Daily Legislative Brief from March 28, 2019
                                  
                                    Health Care
                                      
                                    HB 23 – Relating to Telehealth
                                                                          On Thursday, March 28, HB  23 by Representative Clay Yarborough (R-Jacksonville) was heard in the House  Health & Human Services Committee and  was reported favorably with 14 yeas and 3 nays. AIF’s Senior Vice President of State and Federal Affairs,  Brewster Bevis, stood in support of this legislation.
                                                                          Telehealth is the remote delivery of  health care services using technology. This bill authorizes Florida licensed  health care professionals to use telehealth, simultaneous audio and video, to  deliver health care services within their scopes of practice. The bill also  authorizes out-of-state health care professionals to use telehealth to deliver  health care services to Florida patients if they register with the Department  of Health or the applicable board, meet certain eligibility requirements, and  pay a fee. While an out of state registered provider may use telehealth to  provide health care services to Florida patients, they are prohibited from  opening an office or providing in person services in Florida. For tax years  beginning on or after January 1, 2018, the bill creates a tax credit for health  insurers and health maintenance organizations (HMOs) that cover services  provided by telehealth.
                                     HB 23 will now move to the House floor.
AIF supports legislation that permits an unfettered role for  telehealth services that will help Floridians access better quality care at  lower costs.
                                   
                                    Insurance
                                      
                                    HB  7065 – Relating to Insurance Assignment Agreements
                                                                          On Thursday, March 28, HB 7065, sponsored by the House  Civil Justice Subcommittee, was heard in the House Judiciary Committee and was  reported favorably with 14 yeas and 3 nays. AIF’s Senior Vice President of  State and Federal Affairs, Brewster Bevis, stood in support of this  legislation.
                                                                        The abuse of the one-way attorney fee statute in  relation to “assignment of benefits” (AOB) has created a relatively new form of  litigation over auto glass repairs and property damage. These legal abuses are  perpetrated by a handful of lawyers and vendors who work together to strip  benefits away from policyholders and use these to force higher settlements from  insurers, and even go so far as to sue in the name of the policyholder, often  without the policyholder’s consent. This bill helps prevent future abuse of  AOBs by: 
                                    
                                      - Limiting an assignee’s ability to recover  certain costs from the insured; 
 
                                      - Requiring the assignee to give the insurer  notice of the assignee’s intent to file a lawsuit 
 
                                      - Requiring the insurer to respond to the assignee’s  notice; 
 
                                      - Setting the formula that will determine  which party, if any, receives an award of attorney fees should litigation  related to an assignment agreement result in a judgment; and
 
                                      - Allowing an insurer to offer a policy  prohibiting assignment.
 
                                    
                                    
                                      HB 7065 will now move to the House floor.
AIF supports reforms to the  AOB process to protect consumers against these abuses that drive up insurance  costs.
                                   
                                    Legal & Judicial
                                      
                                    HB  17 – Relating to Tort Reform
                                                                        On Thursday, March 28, HB 17 by Representative Tom  Leek (R-Daytona Beach) was heard in the House  Commerce Committee and was reported favorably with 13 yeas and 7 nays. AIF’s Senior Vice President of State and Federal Affairs,  Brewster Bevis, stood in support of this legislation.
                                                                        Florida currently has the  highest tort system costs among U.S. states as a percentage of state GDP, at  3.6%. In 2016, the total amount paid in costs and compensation within Florida's  tort system averaged $4,442 for each Florida household.  
                                     A flawed tort system  generates exorbitant damages and unpredictability, causing:  
                                    
                                      - Increased  economic costs and increased risks of doing business; 
 
                                      - Higher insurance  premiums;  
 
                                      - Increased  healthcare costs and declining availability of medical services; and  
 
                                      - Deterrence of  economic development and job creation activities. 
 
                                    
                                    
                                    HB 17 will now move to the House  Judiciary Committee.
                                     AIF supports tort reforms which  will dramatically reduce the costs of the tort system in Florida while  providing a better business climate in the state.
                                    Proposed Committee Bill JDC 19-01 – Relating to  Constitutional Amendments 
                                                                        On Thursday, March 28, PCB JDC 19-01 sponsored and  heard by the House Judiciary Committee, was reported favorably with 12 yeas and  6 nays. AIF’s Senior Vice President of State and Federal Affairs,  Brewster Bevis, stood in support of this legislation.
                                                                        This bill  changes the process for amending the constitution by citizen initiative by: 
                    -  Requiring that a petition-gatherer: 
 
                     - Be a Florida resident and register  with the Secretary of State prior to obtaining signatures. 
 
                    - Not be paid based on the number of  petitions gathered. 
                      
                     
                    
                                    
                                      - Requiring the Secretary of State to publish on its website position statements  on proposed amendments received from interested persons.
                                        
                                       
                                    -  Directing the Financial Impact Estimating Conference (FIEC) to: 
 
                                    
                                      - Estimate the amendment's impact on  the state and local economy. 
 
                                      - Complete its analysis and financial  impact statement for the ballot within 60 days after receipt of a proposed  amendment instead of 45 days. 
                                        
                                       
                                    
                                    - Requiring each county supervisor of elections to include a copy of: 
 
                                    
                                      - The FIEC's financial information  summaries in the publication or mailing for sample ballots; and 
 
                                      - The proposed amendment text in each  voting booth. 
                                        
                                       
                                    
                                      -  Requiring the ballot summary to include: 
 
                                    
                                      - The name of the initiative's sponsor  and the percentage of contributions received by the sponsor from in-state  donors;
 
                                      - If the amendment will cost money or  have an indeterminate impact, a statement that passage of the amendment may  result in higher taxes or reduced program funding; and 
 
                                      - A Supreme Court determination as to  whether the proposed policy can be implemented by the Legislature without the  need for a constitutional amendment. 
                                        
                                       
                                    
                                     -  Directing the Attorney General, when seeking Supreme Court review of an  amendment, to ask the Court to:
 
                                     
                                      - Address whether the proposed policy  can be implemented by the Legislature; and 
 
                                      - Identify any undefined terms in the  amendment that will have a substantive impact. 
 
                                     
                                    
 
AIF supports legislation that adds transparency and accountability  to amending the Florida constitution by citizen imitative.