Health Care
                                      
                                    SB 162-Relating to  Payment of Healthcare Claims
                                    On Thursday, February  1st, SB  162, by Senator  Greg Steube (R-Sarasota) was heard before the Senate Committee  on Rules and passed by a vote of 12 yeas to 0 nays. AIF’s  Senior Vice President of State and Federal Affairs, Brewster Bevis, stood in  opposition to this bill.
                                    This bill prohibits  health insurers and health maintenance organizations (HMOs) from retroactively  denying a claim at any time if the insurer or HMO verified the eligibility of  an insured or subscriber at the time of treatment and provided an authorization  number, regardless of if the insured has paid their premiums prior to that  claim rendering them ineligible for coverage.
                                    SB 162 will go on to  the Senate floor for consideration.
                                  AIF opposes legislation requiring insurers to pay  claims for all people, even those that have not paid their premiums because it  would raise costs on employers who would be required to pay health care  expenses of people who are no longer employees, and consumers would bear the  burden of paying the high costs of fraud, waste and abuse that would occur in  the system.
                                   
                                    Legal & Judicial
                                      
                                    SB 760-Relating to  Grounds for Nonrecognition or Out-of-Country Foreign Judgments
                                    On Thursday, February  1st, SB  760, by Senator  Aaron Bean (R-Jacksonville) was heard before the Senate Committee Rules,  and unanimously passed by a vote of 12 yeas to 0 nays. AIF’s Senior  Vice President of State and Federal Affairs, Brewster Bevis, stood in support  of this bill.
                                    This legislation  amends the Uniform Out-Of-Country Foreign Money - Judgment Recognition Act,  codified in chapter 55 F.S., to add two additional permissive grounds for  nonrecognition of a foreign money judgment by a Florida court. The Act  currently provides three mandatory grounds for nonrecognition and eight  permissive grounds for nonrecognition of a foreign judgment. Of the mandatory  grounds that are similar to those in the bill, the Act requires nonrecognition  where the foreign country’s court system is systematically unfair, failing to  provide impartial tribunals and compatible due process of law.
                                    The bill adds two  permissive grounds for when a Florida court may decline to recognize a foreign  judgment on more individualized due process grounds: 
                                    
                                      - There is “substantial  doubt” about the “integrity” of the particular foreign court that rendered the  judgment. 
 
                                      - The particular foreign  court that rendered the judgment failed to afford due process in the  proceedings.
                                        
                                       
                                    
                                    SB 760 will go on to  the Senate floor for consideration.
                                    AIF SUPPORTS  legislation to clarify existing law and protect Florida businesses  from foreign judgments that are not compatible with the requirements of due  process of law. 
                                     
                                    HB 33- Relating to  Texting while Driving
                                    On Thursday, February  1st, HB 33, by Representative Jackie Toledo (R-Tampa)  and Representative Emily Slosberg (D-Delray Beach) was heard by the House  Judiciary Committee and passed. AIF’s Senior Vice President of State  and Federal Affairs, Brewster Bevis, stood in support of this legislation.
                                                                        Currently, Florida law  prohibits a person from texting, emailing, and instant messaging while driving,  however, enforcement of this is a secondary offense, which means a law  enforcement officer must detain a driver for another traffic offense in order  to cite the driver for texting while driving. The bill would change the current  enforcement of the ban on texting while driving from a secondary offense to a primary  offense, allowing law enforcement officers to stop a vehicle solely for texting  while driving. The main goal of this legislation is to eliminate a component  that contributes to distracted driving on Florida’s roadways.
                                    HB 33 will go on to  the House floor for consideration.
AIF supports  legislation that addresses the issue of distracted driving and will ensure  public safety for all on Florida’s roadways.