
Transportation
Infrastructure
A more regional perspective
is required to effectively
consider and keep up with
future demands. |
Why Does it Matter? |
The polling of business leaders,
especially in heavily urbanized
areas of Florida, always finds
that transportation is consistently a
top concern. The productivity of
business is directly impacted by
transportation capacity or the lack
thereof.
More importantly, if a more
efficient approach to transportation
is to succeed, a collective effort by
the private sector may be essential
to overcoming the obstacles of
parochialism and a lack of big
picture thinking that have hampered
real progress with regional
mobility.
In order to see meaningful
changes implemented, strong
business leadership and support
are vital.
|
Among the many challenges
facing Florida’s continued
economic prosperity is the
threat of transportation gridlock.
Much more than a quality of life issue, the development of transportation
infrastructure is essential to the movement of goods and services and of the
state’s workforce. Under SB 360, as passed by 2005 Legislature, transportation
has become the single most problematic aspect of growth management.
By applying true concurrency to all roads, future development in Florida is
tied to not only the future costs, but to our backlog as well. Over the next 18
months, virtually all forms of development requiring a comprehensive plan
amendment will be required to pay its fair share as well as any existing
backlog before proceeding; in most cases, development will be unable to
achieve such an expensive hurdle.
The expansion of businesses and population demands that infrastructure
issues continue to be effectively addressed. To accomplish that goal the state
must be committed to adequately fund transportation and prevent slippage
in the Florida Department of Transportation’s Work Program.
In addition to addressing the impact of a thousand new residents moving
into the state each day, the Florida Legislature must catch up by dealing
with a backlog of infrastructure needs amounting to nearly $25 billion. Investment
should also be made in the technologies of the future to build
intelligent transportation systems. However, the Florida Legislature will need
to be committed to the programs and plans being developed to address the
state’s transportation backlog and will be challenged to find creative and
innovative ways to prevent a potentially disastrous degradation of the state’s
transportation infrastructure.
Unfortunately, local governments are limited in their ability to deal with
the type of transportation problems that do not recognize city or county
borders. A more regional perspective is required to effectively keep up with
future demands. Currently, that type of organizational approach is too limited,
or in most areas, non-existent.
Approaching transportation solutions on a regional basis can have many
advantages, including more comprehensive planning capabilities, the expanded
opportunity to develop large scale partnerships with both public
and private entities, and increasing the likelihood of federal recognition and
federal financial support. It also increases chances that transit efforts are
planned in an area-wide multi-modal model fashion, which will achieve
maximum utilization. These regional transportation authorities should be
governed by boards that include a combination of both public and business
community representatives. |
AIF supports continued dedication from the Florida Legislature to transportation funding and to developing
new ways to address transportation needs through local funding options, public/private partnerships and other
practical finance innovations. In addition, AIF supports the ability of multi-county areas in Florida to form regional
transportation authorities, empowered to implement infrastructure improvements and to increase consideration
for vital transportation corridors, seaports, airports and other regionally significant business centers.
|