WORKERS
COMPENSATION AND THE
2001 LEGISLATIVE SESSION
SOURCE: Mary Ann Stiles
General Counsel – Associated Industries of Florida
The Legislature left a lot
on the table for the employees and employers of this state. The House
simply ran out of time. The House was unable to get a carefully crafted
compromise to the floor and back to the Senate partially due to the confusion
caused by the FCCI Insurance Group, NFIB, FUBA, The Florida Chamber and
the Florida Retail Federation, who got confused and did not understand
the possible effects of the total bill, but relied on erroneous &
inaccurate information supplied by the National Council on Compensation
Insurance (NCCI). Due to the tactics used to kill the bill and the actions
of NCCI, AIF received a lot of pressure to drop the post-MMI indemnity
benefit increase to injured workers.
The proposed increase in SB ll88 and HB l927 that died would have doubled
an injured workers’ impairment benefits after maximum medical improvement.
NCCI advised that this would cause anywhere from a 6 percent to a 6.7
percent premium increase. AIF believes that other changes in the workers
compensation bill that died more than offset the increase. The number
of injured workers that collect permanent total due to the fact there
are few benefits after maximum medical improvement would have been reduced.
The system will always find a way to cost shift when the benefits are
not sufficient, and that is what Florida has done. It is the main reason,
coupled with the substantial amount of litigation, that Florida has
the highest rates in the nation but the lowest statutory benefits. The
benefits actually paid to injured workers, while not contemplated by
statute, is equal to those of other states of comparable size and make-up.The three problem areas - - - permanent total, attorneys’ fees and
the medicare reimbursement schedule in the Senate bill that would have
increased the costs had already been worked out. Those who had not lobbied
this issue all session, chose the last week of the session to try to
kill the Senate bill. Of course, all of their antics played into the
hands of the claimants’ bar who wanted to see no changes made to the
lucrative system they have enjoyed and thanks to the above organizations,
will continue to enjoy.
With all of the chaos, one workers compensation bill did pass – it
took two years, but a non-controversial bill did pass. It was HB l803.
The following provisions are in that bill:
- S.61.14, F.S. provides
that when approving lump sum settlements, a JCC must consider if the
settlement serves the interest of the worker and the worker’s family
when considering the appropriate recovery of any child-support arrearag.
- S.6l.30, F.S. provides
that income shall mean all workers compensation benefits and settlements.
- S.440.02(l4)ll. provides
that a person who performs services as a sport official for an entity
sponsoring an interscholastic sports event or for a public entity
or private, non-profit organization that sponsors an amateur event
is an independent contractor and not an employee. This includes any
person who is a neutral participant in a sports event including umpires,
referees, judges, linespersons, scorekeepers or timekeepers. This
definition does not apply to any person employed by a district school
board and who serves as a sports official as part of his/her job.
- S.440.02(16)5 provides
that employment does not include a state prisoner or county inmate,
except those performing services for private employers or those listed
in s. 948.03(8)(a).
- S.440.09(2) clarifies
that employees covered under The Defense Base Act are not covered
under the state’s workers compensation system.
- S.440.l025 provides that
a public employer seeking a premium discount due to workplace safety
must have a workplace safety program.
- S.440.12; 440.20(l)(a)
and 440.20(6) allows a carrier, with the authorization from an employee,
to deposit his or her benefit check directly into an employee’s bank
account.
- S.440.l35 eliminates
the requirement of mandatory managed care and makes the program voluntary.
- S.440.13(2)(f) allows
the employee, upon written request, the right to a one time change
of physician for any reason during the course of treatment for any
one accident. The employee is entitled to select such physician from
not fewer than three carrier authorized physicians who are not professionally
affiliated.
- S.440.l3(3)(a) deletes
the requirement that physicians in order to be certified by the Division
must complete a 5 hour course on the aspects of workers compensation.
- S.440.13(4)(c) provides
that authorized qualified rehabilitation providers are allowed access
to medical records.
- S.440.l4(5)(a) clarifies
that if there are any wages as a result of concurrent employment,
the employee is responsible for providing information concerning same
to the employer/carrier. No penalties, interest, costs and attorneys
fees are paid during any period for any benefits that the employee
has not advised the employer/carrier of the information necessary
to calculate the average weekly wage to include concurrent employment.
- S.440.l85(9) allows the
division to contract with a private entity for the collection of policy
information required to be filed by carriers to include the receipt
of notices of cancellations or expirations of policies.
- S.440.192(1) requires
that a petition must be filed by certified mail or by electronic means
with the Office of the Judges of Compensation Claims (a new office
under the Department of Administrative Hearings). Copies shall also
be served upon the employer and the employer’s carrier. The Deputy
Chief Judge (a new position created under DOAH) shall refer the petitions
to the judges of compensation claims.
- S.440.l92(2) requires
that the JCC shall review and dismiss each petition or a portion of
the petition (docketing orders and docketing judges were eliminated
in section 440.45(3); however, this language still maintains the requirement
for the judge to dismiss petitions or portions of petitions that do
not meet the filing requirement of the statute.) This section further
provides for additional information on the petitions to include: the
date or dates of accident; the specific classifications of compensation
that were not timely paid; and the date that the request for mileage
was filed with the carrier and requires that a copy must be attached
to the petition. An assertion by the carrier to dismiss a petition
that is not specific is waived if not done within 30 days of receipt
of the petition.
- S.440.192(8) requires
that the employer/carrier file a Response to Petition rather than
the Notice of Denial, especially when all benefits listed in the petition
have been paid or agreed to.
- S.440.l92(4) clarifies
that the initial provision of compensation or benefits means the first
installment of compensation or benefits to be paid by the carrier
under subsection (2) or pursuant to a petition for benefits under
s.440.l92(8) in determining when benefits should have been paid without
penalty when the carrier exercises its right to investigate the employee’s
entitlement to benefits to either admit or deny compensability within
120 days after the initial provision of compensation or benefits.
- S.440.20(ll)(a)(b) and
(c) are substantially changed to allow a JCC to approve lump sum settlements
only when the claimant is not represented by counsel. When the claimant
is represented by counsel, the JCC would still have authority to approve
any fees paid by the employee to his attorney or any issue relating
to the payment of child support arrearages provided for in a lump
sum settlement stipulation. JCCs are required to consider "whether
any and all benefits, including settlements, provide for the appropriate
recovery of any child support arrearages. JCCs would have no other
authority over settlements. All orders are payable within l4 days
rather than the current 7 days. The only information or documentation
needed to be submitted to the JCC is documentation necessary for a
claimant’s attorney to support their fees charged to the employee.
Any order entered herein is not considered an award and is not subject
to modification or review. Settlements entered into when both parties
are represented by counsel are valid for all dates of accidents.
- S.440.20(ll)(a) changes
the l20 day requirement for lump sum settlements so that the l20 day
period would begin to run when the employer receives notice of the
injury rather an from the date of the injury
- S.440.22 eliminates the
exemption of workers compensation claims from creditors as to an award
of child support or alimony.
- S.440.25 provides that
the claimant or the adjuster may, at the mediator’s discretion, attend
the mediation by telephone if agreed to by the parties.
- S.440.25(4)(b) requires
the consent of the claimant for the second continuance of a final
hearing.
- S.440.25(4)(c) requires
a JCC to enter an order within 30 days, and not l4 days, after the
final hearing is completed. The summary manner language is deleted.
The JCC may enter an abbreviated order in cases in which compensability
is not disputed. Either party may request separate findings of fact
and conclusions of law.
- S.440.25(4)(g) which
required JCCs to adopt and enforce uniform rules was deleted.
- S.440.25(5) eliminates
the division from the process of insolvency petitions.
- S.440.38 limits the types
of security deposits that self insurers can use; the right to call
a qualifying security deposit; irrevocable letter of credit with financial
institutions located within this state and requires current self insurers
to comply on or before December 31, 200l or upon the maturity of existing
security deposits, whichever occurs later.
- S.440.44 requires that
The Office of Judges of Compensation Claims shall maintain the l7
district offices, 3l judges of compensation claims, and 3l mediators
as they exist on June 30, 200l
- S.440.442 requires judges
of compensation claims to observe and abide by the Code of Judicial
Conduct.
- S. 440.45 transfers the
judges of compensation claims to the Office of Management Services
and creates The Office of Judges of Compensation Claims headed by
a Deputy Chief Judge who will report to the director of the Division
of Administrative Hearings. The Deputy must "demonstrate prior
administrative experience". The current Chief Judge’s term expires
October l, 200l and the position of Deputy Chief Judge is created.
Changes the qualifications of appointing Judges from "being a
member of The Florida Bar in good standing and is knowledgeable in
the practice of workers compensation law" to "a member of
The Florida Bar in good standing for the previous 5 years and is experienced
in the practice of workers compensation." As of July l, 2002,
when the nominating commission determines whether a judge’s performance
is satisfactory, the commission shall consider if the judge has met
the requirements of this chapter. Allows the Governor to fill vacancies
for JCCs and such person can serve for up to l20 successive days.
Allows the Director of DOAH to receive or initiate complaints, conduct
investigations, and dismiss complaints against the Deputy Chief Judge
or any JCC on the basis of the Code of Judicial Conduct. The Director
may recommend for removal or discipline of any judge whose conduct
warrants.
- S.440.45(3) repeals docketing
orders and docketing judges.
- S.440.45(5) provides
for a report to various entities annually summarizing the amount,
cost and outcome of all litigation and the disposition of mediation
conferences, the number of mediation conferences held, the number
of continuances granted for mediations and final hearings, the amount
of attorney’s fees paid in each case according to accident and order
year and the number of untimely orders entered. If judges are generally
unable to meet any guidelines due to it being beyond their control,
the Deputy Chief Judge shall submit such findings and recommendations
to the Legislature.
- S.440.49(2)(e) conforms
the repeal of the Special Disability Trust Fund Privatization Commission.
- S.440.593 allows employers
or carriers to submit required forms electronically, either directly
or indirectly through a third party; allows the division to revoke
the certification of any carrier or vendor in noncompliance with performance
standards; and allows the division to assess a civil penalty not to
exceed $500 for each such violation. i.e. the untimely filing of a
Notice of Injury.
- S.489.114, 489.ll5, 489.5l0
and 489.5l5 resolves the conflict in that one of the prerequisites
for obtaining a contractor’s license under Chapter 489 is to have
proof of coverage or proof of an exemption under s.440.l05 and then
to show proof of a contractor’s license. A person cannot meet these
prerequisites simultaneously. The statute will now allow an applicant
for initial issuance of a certificate and renewal as a contractor
as a prerequisite to qualifying for an exemption from coverage to
file an affidavit attesting that he will obtain an exemption within
30 days after the initial certificate or renewal is issued by the
Board.
- S.627.914 requires carriers
and self-insurance funds to file certain premium, dividend, and loss
date to the Department of Insurance. The Legislature established this
requirement in l978 when the Department used this information to evaluate
rates. Now, statistical agents and rating organization collect calendar
year-accident data which have been used in rate making since the early
l980’s. Since the department does not use that data, this section
eliminates the requirement to report such data to the department.
Now instead of April lst it will be July lst that insurers will continue
to report such information to their statistical agent or rating organization.
Self insurance funds would also be required to submit such data.
- S.627.09l5 reinstitutes
the authority to allow for a safety premium credit to those who have
implemented a safety program pursuant to the provisions of the rating
plan.
- S.627.3ll would correct
an inadvertent error by inserting the word "not" before
the word "unlawful." As a result, a board member of the
FWCJUA would immunity from civil liability only when the board members
reasonably believe that his or her conduct was not criminal.
WHAT DID
NOT PASS THIS LEGISLATIVE SESSION
SB ll88/HB
l927 died in Senate messages to the House in the last hours of the session.
Included in this bill were the following:
- Exemptions – Effective
January l, 2002, two corporate officers or of any group of affiliated
corporations can be exempt from coverage and allows such election
only to a corporate officer that has ownership of at least l0%.
Provides
that every enterprise conducting business shall maintain business records
re exempt officers; any partnerships with exempt partners must maintain
written exemptions; sole proprietor or partners must maintain a copy
of federal income tax records for the immediate previous three years;
failure to have these records allows the division to issue a stop-work
order if such affidavit and tax returns are not available within 3 business
days; a corporation must be listed on the records of this states’ Secretary
of State as a corporate officer; if not listed and no affidavit re being
a corporate officer is not available, the division can issue a stop
work order if such documents are not furnished within 3 days.
Notwithstanding
any other provision, effective January l, 2004, any partnership, corporation
or sole proprietor, regardless of the number of employees, actively
engaged in the construction industry shall secure and maintain workers
compensation coverage at all time. (This does not address the serious
problem with the use of independent contractors by businesses who allege
these individuals to be independent contractors when they are in fact
employees and in any other industry would be covered)
- Permanent Total Disability – Eliminated the social security provision from the definition of
permanent total. The NCCI stated this change alone would save l.8
percent in premiums. Also provided that an injury had to be of a nature
and severity that prevents the employee from being able to perform
his or her previous work. If the employee is engaged in or is capable
of engaging in any gainful employment, he is not entitled to these
benefits. The burden is on the employee to establish that such work
is not available within 50 mile radius of the employee’s residence.
- Coverage issues – In cases involving occupation disease or repetitive exposure, both
causation and sufficient exposure to support causation shall be proven
by the preponderance of evidence; provides that if an employer misrepresents
to a carrier the size or classification of the employer’s payroll,
such failure or misrepresentation allows the division to issue a stop
work order.
- Tort Actions –
eliminates the right of an employee to sue another employee of the
same employer when assigned to unrelated works; provides that if an
employee recovers damages from an employer by either judgment or settlement,
the carrier has the right to an offset against the benefits it paid.
- Attendant Care – clarifies that those who maintain their regular employment and provide
attendant care to a family member shall be paid the per-hour value
of the person’s employment not to exceed the per hour value of such
care in the community. The current law only addresses those who quit
their work to provide such care.
- Independent Medical
Exams (IME) – Upon written request of the employee, the carrier
shall pay the cost of one IME per accident. The cost of any additional
IME is the responsibility of the party ordering same. However, if
a JCC relies on a claimant’s IME at the final hearing, the employer/carrier
shall be responsible for payment. Eliminates the criteria to get an
IME and the language that a claimant’s attorney can’t set an IME;
allows the employee or the carrier to submit into evidence only one
IME per specialty; in cases involving occupational disease or repetitive
trauma, no medical opinions are admissible unless based on reliable
scientific principles sufficiently established to have gained general
acceptance in the pertinent area of specialty; provides no attorney’s
fees by the carrier for the claimant’s attorney relating to any IME
issue. Also allowed IME opinions into evidence.
- Medical Fee Schedule – With the elimination of mandatory managed care, authorization was
included to allow entities to contract for fees up to l25% of the
fee schedule. Since managed care was made voluntary in another bill,
and this language did not pass, fees charged for medical care may
not exceed the fee schedule. May can be read as permissive.
- Managed Care –
defined grievance to mean "a direct written complaint filed by
the injured worker" due to the managed care arrangement refusal
to provide medical care; provides that within l5 days after the date
of the request for medical care is received that it must be granted
or denied. If not responded to within l5 days, the request is deemed
granted and the grievance procedures exhausted.
- Average Weekly Wage – Cleaned up the definition of average weekly wage calculation by
eliminating the week of injury from the calculation and eliminated
"consecutive period of 91 days"; required a record of the
employee’s earnings for the l3 weeks before the date of injury be
attached to the Notice of Injury filed by the employer; provided for
expedited resolution of the average weekly wage without a final hearings
on the issue.
- Psychological Issues – eliminated compensation for any preexisting mental, psychological
or emotional conditions.
- Increased Impairment
Benefits – doubled the amount of benefits an injured employee
received after maximum medical improvement from "50% of the employee’s
average weekly temporary total disability benefits" to "l00%
of the employee’s compensation rate." If a person earned $500
a week prior to injury with a 5% impairment the benefits would be
$5,002.50 rather than $2,50l.25 paid today.
- Office of Employees’
Assistance (EAO) – Allows the division to initiate contact with
the injured employee after receiving a copy of the petition to discuss
rights and responsibilities of the employee and services available
from the Employees’ Assistance and Ombudsman Office; allows the Office
to attempt to facilitate an agreement between the parties. This was
permissive in that the Request for Assistance was eliminated.
- Request for Assistance
(RFA) – eliminated the necessity of filing one.
- Petitions – Added
to the list of what must be filed with the petition "a copy of
the physician’s request, authorization or recommendation for treatment
or attendance care", when the employee is requesting medical
treatment or a change in medical care. Today such petitions are filed
and the carrier has no knowledge of the reason for the request being
made in the first place. It is petition by ambush to guarantee an
attorney’s fee.
- Lump Sum Settlements
and Child Suport Arreages – HB l803 which passed provides that
the JCC must consider whether the settlement provides for the appropriate
recovery of any child support arrearages. While this was not intended
to force a higher settlement to cover child support payments, this
language certainly sounds that way. Not passed in HB l927 was the
language that stated that the JCC would consider the settlement allocation
and if it provided for appropriate recovery for child support arrearages.
Also not included in the bill that passed was language that stated
neither the employer nor the carrier has a duty to investigate or
collect information regarding child support arrearages. The bill that
failed provided that any conflicts between any provisions relating
to child support arrearages was superceded by HB 1927.
- Mediations – One
of the major issues that failed was the new mediation process. This
process would have guaranteed prompt decisions to injured workers
by requiring that within 90 days after the Petition was filed, a mediation
conference had to be held. Within 40 days after the petition being
filed the JCC was to notify parties by order that unless a mediation
had already been held, such order had to give the date by which mediation
must be held. Provided that continuances granted only for reasons
that are beyond the party’s control who requested the continuance.
Provided that any order granting a continuance must set for the new
mediation date. Provided that mediation is not to be used solely to
mediate attorneys’ fees. Provided that unless the parties conducted
a private mediation, the mediation would be conducted by a public
mediator. If no public mediator was available, the parties were required
to attend a private mediation at the expense of the carrier within
the 90-day time frame. If the parties could not agree on a mediator,
the JCC would appoint a mediator. Today it takes up to a year in some
parts of this state to get a mediation scheduled. Some JCCs allow
continuances without good cause. The injured employee is caught between
his own attorney, the JCC, the system and the carrier and its defense
attorney. Expenses would have been greatly reduced and the animosity
felt by injured workers who can not get an answer for a lengthy period
of time would have lessened.
- Pretrial stipulations – Required the parties in good faith to complete a pretrial stipulation
at the mediation conference if the issues were not resolved. If the
stipulations are not completed timely, the JCC was required to hold
a pretrial hearing within l4 days. Today both sides wait months for
the pretrial to be set or for the stipulation from either the claimant’s
attorney or the defense attorney. And some judges do not set the final
hearing until the pretrial stipulation is received. In the meantime,
hours are being churned in the files by plantiff attorneys.
- Final Hearings –
Required that the final hearing must be held within 90 days after
the mediation conference. Allowed continuances only for reasons beyond
the party’s control; the order had to state the new date of final
hearing if continuance granted; and if a JCC granted two or more continuances
the JCC had to report the continuances to the Deputy Chief Judge.
These provisions guaranteed that all Petitions had to be resolved
or a final hearing held within 2l0 days from the filing of the petition.
Today injured workers in some parts of this state can’t get a final
hearing for over one and one-half years. Some case are as long as
3 to 5 years. Some Judges simply do not push their docket and require
that all petitions be resolved in a timely manner. Of course, such
lack of attention to their dockets results in increased hours by attorneys
in files.
- Expedited Hearings – Added to the provisions that expedited dispute resolutions for any
claim for benefits under $5,000 or less the issues of medical only
benefits or medical mileage. Requires l5 days notice and no more than
30 minutes a side and neither party is required to be represented
by counsel.
- Motions to Dismiss
for Lack of Prosecution – Required a JCC to either on his motion
or a party’s motion to dismiss a petition that has had no record activity
for l2 months. The Workers Compensation Rules of Procedure has made
it more difficult for a carrier to get a petition dismissed. This
provision would have followed civil rules of procedure.
- Interest on Medical
Bills – Prohibited a JCC from awarding interest on medical bills.
- Attorneys Fees – Increased the formula for attorneys’ fees from 20/l5/l0/5 to
25/20/l5/l0. Allowed a one time additional fee per accident on medical
only petitions to be based on an hourly rate not to exceed $l750.
As to compensability issues, if the JCC found that the formula did
not adequately compensate the claimant’s attorney, the JCC could award
an additional fee, based on a reasonable hourly rate not to exceed
$5000. The bill eliminated all other use of the hourly rates. Attorneys’
fees did not attach to the petition until 30 days after the receipt.
Today the employer/carrier has 30 days from the receipt of the Request
for Assistance and l4 days from the receipt of the petition to pay
benefits before attorneys’ fees attached. The problem is that in most
instances the carrier does not get the Request for Assistance and
the only notice it gets that benefits are requested is when it receives
the Petition. The bill that failed would have required the petition
be furnished to the employer and the carrier and then it had 30 days
to either pay or deny. Many more injured workers would have gotten
benefits faster under the bill that failed. Today attorneys purposely
do not send the Request for Assistance to the carrier, in that it
plays "petition by ambush" to guarantee an attorney’s fee.
- Evidence – No
duty is imposed on the carrier to preserve evidence pertaining to
an accident or injury. It would have clarified that it is the employer’s
responsibility as the carrier has no control over the employer’s property.
- Firefighters –
Excluded firefighters from the definition of permanent total and allows
firefighters a presumption that a disability may be permanent and
total disability.
- The Workers Compensation
Oversight Board – Repealed the Board. It is rumored that this
board was actually repealed in another bill.
Effective Date –
The law was to become effective 1/1/02.
Mary
Ann Stiles, Esquire, was once again during the 2001 Session
of the Florida Legislature the major drafter and lobbyist
for legislation regarding workers’ compensation which was
in the best interests of Florida employers. As she has since
she first joined Associated Industries as Vice-President &
General Counsel in 1978, Ms Stiles was the leader in drafting
and lobbying workers’ compensation legislation to improve
the system for both employers and injured workers. Ms. Stiles
formed her own law firm in 1984 (Stiles, Taylor & Grace,
P.A.) and since that time has continued to represent Associated
Industries on workers’ compensation, both in the legislative
arena and as the only litigation counsel for the Associated
Industries Insurance Company. No one in Florida has dedicated
themselves more to the task of addressing the workers’ compensation
law for longer, or as successfully, as Ms. Stiles has done
for the past 23 years. All employers and injured workers in
Florida owe a debt of gratitude to Ms. Stiles for her diligence
and perseverance in the workers’ compensation arena.
During the last few days of the 2001 Session, Ms. Stiles was
approached with the proposition that "…if you will back
off of the doubling of benefits to injured workers, we will
support passage of the major workers’ compensation bill."
Ms. Stiles approached me with the strong recommendation that
we not back off the proposed increase in benefits for injured
workers and I totally concurred. If we had backed off, the
statutory benefits to injured workers still would have been
too low, as they are today, and the system would not have
been fixed.
AIF sincerely appreciates the hard work and dedication on
workers’ compensation of Governor Jeb Bush, Senator Jack Latvala,
and Representatives JD Alexander, Jerry Melvin, Dennis Ross,
and Leslie Waters, who worked diligently to pass balanced
workers’ compensation legislation.
AIF is also indebted to its 21 lobbyists who backed up the
effort of Ms. Stiles in educating legislators throughout this
session on why the proposed legislation was good for both
employers and injured workers.
Jon L. Shebel
President & Chief Executive Officer
Associated Industries of Florida
|
|